"The very concept of objective truth is fading out of the world" - George Orwell


Friday, January 27, 2012

Screening The TSA Theater

On Monday, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky was kept from boarding his flight from Nashville for refusing to consent to a body pat down.  This refusal came after a routine alarm sounded when going through the security check point.  He was denied access to the terminal and was rescheduled for a later flight, where he was rescreened without incident.  Paul, an outspoken critic of the TSA, released this statement concerning the incident, "the police state in this country is growing out of control.  One of the ultimate embodiments of this is the TSA that gropes and grabs our children, our seniors, and our loved ones and neighbors with disabilities.  The TSA does all of this while doing nothing to keep us safe."  While I don't agree with Paul's politics, or entirely with the statement that the TSA does "nothing" to keep us safe, I do applaud him for bringing this issue back to the forefront and hopefully begin a discussion on what the TSA has become and where it is headed.


We've all been there.  Arriving at the airport in plenty of time just to endure the nightmare that is the TSA screening process.  We are looked up and down, scrutinized, our baggage searched and manipulated.  Most of us don't think twice about this procedure.  This type of TSA screening has become commonplace since 9/11 and any grumblings are swept aside by the thought of "hey, it's for our safety".  But what this whole process actually is is an elaborate theater production that gives the public a false sense of security while lining the pockets of big business.

It goes without saying that 9/11 changed the perception of security in this country, and more specifically, airport security.  In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks measures were instituted to protect us more thoroughly.  While some of these, such as extensive explosive scanning of checked baggage, were long overdue, the majority have nothing to do with the attacks themselves.  The failure of 9/11 had nothing to do with airport screening and has everything to do with the failure of the FBI, CIA, and our intelligence community as a whole.  The fact that these terrorists had boxcutters on the plane is irrelevant.  As anyone who has watched a prison show will tell you, it's easy to make a weapon out of just about anything and smuggle it around with ease.  Most likely even a threat of a bomb would have produces the same outcome.  What they had working to their advantage was surprise and an antiquated thinking of hijacking.  Up until that point when one thought of a hijacked airplane thoughts went to a plane being diverted to foreign soil and a hostage negotiation breaking out.  Now, the hijacking paradigm has changed, and even if Mark Wahlberg isn't on your plane, the potential hijacker most likely won't get halfway down the cabin before they are tackled by the passengers.  The element of surprise is gone.

                                         (Who needs air marshals when we have Marky Mark?)

Despite this we continue to spend billions of our tax dollars on preventing an attack that has already happened and likely will not happen again.  Chief among these are the full body scanners.  These are machines that scan your body and essentially take an x-ray picture of your body, sans clothes, for the screener to evaluate.  Removing the fact that these raise serious privacy issues, how likely are these to actually prevent a terrorist attack?  They are not used at every airport or at every terminal.  If a terrorist does approach a checkpoint where one is in use, they simply need to get in the line with the old fashion metal detector.  We have spent billions on these machines and don't have anything to show for it, other than slower lines and the companies who manufacture them getting a huge payday.  It seems to me a more cost efficient and more productive approach would be bomb sniffing dogs.  They are effective and much less obtrusive then these screeners.  And who wouldn't like to enter the eden that is the airport terminal with the sight of an adorable pooch sniffing around?

But one of the most egregious measures instituted by the TSA is the policy that all pilots and flight attendants must go through the same screening procedures as the passengers.  These pilots, many of them retired military who flew multi-billion dollar aircrafts with payloads that could decimate an entire community, are subject to the same intrusive behavior from the TSA as everyone else.  What makes this even more mind blowing is that the ground crews, baggage carriers, and caterers who work at the airports are fully exempt from this screening.  That's right, no screening at all.  I'm sure many are unaware of this, which is yet another glowing example of our media failure.  This is a national embarrassment that these people who have unadulterated access to our aircrafts can literally just walk onto the tarmac while the people who are entrusted with our safety day in and day out are publicly humiliated.  This is not to insinuate that baggage carriers and the like are potential threats, but the double standard is glaring and shows the ineptness and lack of rational thinking by the TSA.

                                (Can we expect even more ridiculous signs like this in the future?)


Apparently all of this is now acceptable.  If you were told of the procedures we would have to go through today in order board an airplane 12 years ago you'd most likely laugh.  But that's not the case.  A perfect storm of reactionary politics, fear mongering, and the willingness of the general public to accept anything, no matter how infringing or inconvenient, in the name of safety has caused this nightmare we find ourselves in.  The TSA is a bureaucracy created quickly with enormous power and little accountability, and no doubt will view any form of restructuring as a threat to their authority and funding.  There are common sense answers, such as focussing more on intelligence, explosive scanning, and on the person boarding the plane rather than their baggage.  By implementing some of these steps and streamlining the system we currently operate under we will become safer and more efficient in preventing another attack.  However there is no magic answer.  All of the preparation and determination in the world will not stop an intelligent radical.  Unfortunately, with the a silent public and neutered media, it is unlikely any of this will change soon.  And if, God forbid, we are attacked again, I fear any progress we have made will be swept under the rug by panic and fear.  More of our rights and liberties will be infringed upon and maddeningly unsuited policies implemented to appease these public fears.  It's time our government stops treating us as children.  We as Americans need to come to terms and focus more on the reality of the world we are now living in then fantasy the TSA presents.  If not we may one day wake up no safer then we were and a lot less free.



Thursday, January 19, 2012

For Your Entertainment: The Lake Show vs. Lob City

It was not my intention for my second blog post to again touch on the sports world.   This is not solely a sports related blog, and I don't want to give that impression.  However, my brother and I had the opportunity last night to attend the Clippers game versus the defending champion Dallas Mavericks at Staples Center.  For those of you who are unaware, this offseason the Clippers, the perennial laughing stock of the NBA, shocked the league by acquiring arguably the best point guard alive in Chris Paul, stealing him away from their Staples co-tenants, the Lakers.  Coupled with other signings, and pairing Paul with the shooting star that is Blake Griffin, "Lob City" was born and the Clippers have become instant title contenders.  But to me attending this game wasn't purely about basketball. It was about experiencing the new Clippers.  The talk around L.A. since the offseason is that the Clippers have overtaken the Lakers as the "it" team in the city.  Sure watching Blake Griffin soar through the air to throw down an ally-oop with his teeth is breathtaking, but I was more interested in the entertainment factor of attending the game. More specifically, how does attending a Clippers game compare in entertainment value (not related to what is happening on the court) to attending a Lakers game.  The following is a breakdown of what was observed in "Lob City", and how it stands up to being part of the Lakers experience.

(Full disclosure: I am a die hard Lakers fan. I have been for as long as I can remember and always will be. This being said, and I hope my previous post was evidence of this, I have no problem being objective and criticizing the teams I love, in this case, the purple and gold.)


PRE-GAME


As we took our seats during warm-ups we were greeted with the blaring of hip-hop music, as is the case with most NBA games these days.  The only difference is that the Clippers have employed the services of a hype man.  For the uninformed, a hype man's essential purpose is to get the crowed excited, in this case for the upcoming game.  They essentially interrupt the music being played to say things like "get ready", "here we go", and other random quotes that really just annoy those listening.  If you'd like an example, just turn on any hip-hop radio station after 9 p.m.  Anyway, DJ Dense (his actual name) carried on until the buzzer sounded, calling out people in the stands, trying his best to create a buzz.  Unfortunately, people seemed more interested in texting and facebook updating.

Like the Clippers, you're normally greeted at a Lakers game with an array of hip-hop, but mixed in is the familiar sound of the L.A. Laker Band, a brass band that has been a mainstay at games forever.  No hype man is needed when you hear a live, horn infused version of Cameo's "Word Up".  Live music creates its own buzz, and to the Lakers credit, have stuck with them for years and years.

EDGE: LAKERS

PRE-GAME MONTAGE

The home team introductions usually are preceded by a highlight infused montage on the Jumbotron of the players to excite the home crowd and get them to a fever pitch before the ball is tipped.  The Clippers are no different.  However, their montage consisted of some highlights from preseason games versus the Lakers and the dunkfest put on by Blake Griffin against the Knicks last season.  This is a clear reminder that despite their offseason acquisitions, they are still the Clippers.

                                                        (Blake Griffin's dunking clinic)


The Lakers introduction is a production.  Sheets are draped from the Jumbotron and highlights from previous championship celebrations, former players, along with current player highlights are displayed in a Hollywood type display.  As a casual fan it is quite the production.  As a Laker fan it is chill inducing.

                                      (If you're not excited after watching this, then just go home)


EDGE: LAKERS

PLAYER INTERACTION

It always interests me in attending games to see how the players interact with each other.  Putting together a team of individuals with different backgrounds and personalities is always difficult, as you never know how they will mesh with one another.  In this regard, the Clippers are a joy to watch.  They all seem to be having a great time, laughing and joking with one another.  And why not?  They are playing a game, and keeping it fun and loose is a great way to approach any such contest.  The rituals that they have prior to game time was also very entertaining to watch.  Chris Paul has to fist bump everyone, including coaches and staff, before tipoff.  Reggie Evans goes down the bench slapping palms with every player.  Mo Williams must slap hands with everyone twice (OCD?) before making his way onto the court.  Even during the game they continue on in this same way.  At one point when Chauncey Billups, an excellent free throw shooter, missed the first of two shots, Mo Williams goes up to him, grabs his hand, and slaps it like a mother scolding a toddler.  This was a hilarious moment, and one that is indicative of the true joy they have playing with each other.

The Lakers approach the games more business oriented.  They take on the view of their leader, Kobe Bryant, who, to put it mildly, is not exactly loose to begin a game.  There are no smiles and no laughing during pre-game.  Kobe's teammates seem to be in fear of upsetting him, and lately this carries onto the floor.

EDGE: CLIPPERS

CHEERLEADERS

Every team in the league now a days employs a troupe of dancers to perform at halftime and during timeouts. The Clippers, being no different, have the "Clippers Spirit", which has to be one of the worst names in all of sports.  While I have watch about 15 minutes of "Dancing with the Stars" thanks to my girlfriend, I don't think that makes me an expert on choreography, so I won't touch that.  But in addition to the "Spirit", the Clippers also trot out a group of tumblers to rah it up and make human pyramids.  Because nothing says NBA entertainment like a pudgy 30 something holding up a petite girl with one hand.

The Lakers, on the other hand, have the "Laker Girls".  Enough said.

EDGE: LAKERS

FANS

Celebrities

As with anything in L.A., it's about being seen.  As such, our NBA franchises are judged by the celebrity fans they attract.  Will the Clippers new found relevency draw A listers to a nationally televised game?  The answer is, not so much.  The Clippers biggest fan is probably Billy Crystal.  He showed up late wearing a very douchey beret, and politely watched the game, nodding every so often when the Clippers did something good.  And as my brother pointed out, he's a Clipper fan and a Yankee fan, so his sports loyalty is obviously a bit confusing.  The other "relevant" Clipper fan is Frankie Muniz.  From what I saw he was not in attendance, but lets be honest, who's seen that guy since his shitty TV show went off the air?  It's entirely possible he was there and has just grown into an awkward looking twink like Macaulay Culkin.  I could have walked by him and not even noticed.  Or maybe he was the one who sold me a beer.  I don't know.  Also gracing Staples Center with their presence was part of the Kardashian clan, Kim, Khloe, and their mom, Kris.  It's hard to determine what drove them to attend and sit courtside, the fact that Lamar Odom was playing (so far he's kept his maiden name) or the fact it was a chance to be seen on national television.  Whatever the reason, I do have to give Khloe some credit.  While the other two where gabbing it up the entire game with other people, Khloe was intently watching the game, cheering on her husband.  I will now go punch myself repeatedly in the face for complimenting a Kardashian.

                                                 (Is this Frankie Muniz's doppelganger?)

Notable Laker fans:  Leonardo DiCaprio, Andy Garcia, Diane Cannon, Denzel Washington, and, of course, Jack.

EDGE: LAKERS

Common

This is where I was most curious to see the change in "Clipper Nation" from last year to this one.  It goes without saying that there would be a large crowd as opposed to the half empty stadium they drew last year.  But how would the fans react?  Has their basketball IQ grown higher?  Would the new bandwagon fans change the crowd dynamic?  As the game began the Clipper fans were very subdued.  It remained eerily quiet throughout, reminiscent of previous years, as one person yelling something could be heard throughout Staples.  A fire was finally lit under their asses after Randy Foye threw a beautiful lob to Blake Griffin who nearly hit his elbow on the rim.  They came back to earth until the time that everyone attending a game is eagerly anticipating:  FREE T-SHIRTS!!!  I never understood the lure of obtaining a shirt plastered with a sponsor that's shitty quality at best.  But man the crowds go crazy.  Even Laker fans.  Although glaringly absent was the weapon of choice for this demonstration, the t-shirt cannon.  Did Chris Paul's contract force Donald Sterling to cut back on this?  Or was it the attorney fees for his ever increasing discrimination lawsuits that caused the team to depend on the strength and accuracy of the arms of the "Clipper Spirit" and the drill team?  The fans did finally get woken up as Dallas made a late run and actually took the lead with 5 seconds left.  They stood and cheered and were into it at that point.  This was a pleasant surprise from previous years, and a good sign of things to come in "Clipper Nation".  They also mercilessly booed the Kardashian's when they were shown on the Jumbotron, the ladies facial expressions clearly showing disdain for the fans and their reaction to their presence.  The Clipper fans will have a small place in my heart for this.

                       (If the name isn't great enough, he's also "that guy" who wears a jersey over a button up shirt)

Laker fans have often been criticized for a wide variety of reasons.  From arriving to games late, to dressing as if you are going to a club or to an award show, Laker games are seen by outsiders as more events then mere sporting events.  People go to be seen rather than root for the Lakers.  While there are some who this holds true, this is overall a false perception.  Laker fans are very knowledgable about the game, and while they are not wild and crazy throughout like those fans in Portland or Oklahoma City, they know circumstances and respond accordingly.  Whether its to boost the team when they are slumping, or chanting "DEFENSE" at the top of their lungs when an important stop in needed, the Laker crowd responds.  Bucking another myth, they stay until the end of the game, thanks in large part to the greatest closer on the planet, Kobe Bryant.  They are always in the game as long as he is breathing, and Laker fans know this.  They are an underrated bunch, but a group that knows their basketball, timing, and place during the game.

EDGE: LAKERS

Clearly, and not surprisingly, the Clippers have a way to go to match the spectacle and show that is put on game in and game out by the Lakers.  The Buss' know that attending a game isn't just about what is on the court, but the entire experience, and cater to this.  The Clippers are learning, like any younger brother, and may get there with time.  But for my money, nothing compares to witnessing the full pageantry of a Lakers game, unless you like watching repetitive high screen and rolls with Blake Griffin catching the ball too far way from the basket (sorry Clipper fans, I couldn't resist).



Tuesday, January 17, 2012

The Return Of Kobe 2.0

From an outsiders point of view the beginning of this 2011-12 NBA season is going fantastic in Lakerland.  After starting the year with consecutive losses, the Lakers have gone 10-3 since.  Kobe Bryant has been unconscious, leading the league in scoring at 30.8 ppg and asserting himself as (still) the best player alive.  After the aborted Chris Paul trade before the season began the team is prospering better than anyone could have expected.  However, taking a step back, the Lakers, and more specifically Kobe Bryant, appear to be retreading a path that most Laker fans would like to put behind them.

It was only 6 years ago, during the 2005-06 season, that Kobe decided to reinvent himself.  The drama of coexisting with Shaquille O'Neal was behind him, and the Lakers were undoubtably his team.  Playing with the likes of Smush Parker and Kwame Brown, Kobe 2.0 was the Laker offense, and he tailored his game as such.  He stormed out of the gate, logging a string of 40+ point games that was a thing of beauty (he finished the season with an amazing 27 40+ games!) and averaged 35.4 ppg, shooting the ball a mind numbing 2,173 times in 80 games.  This was also the season he dropped 63 on Dallas after just 3 quarters, outscoring the entire Mavericks team by 1, and in January, exploded for 81 against a hapless Toronto team.  Kobe led the Lakers into the playoffs against Phoenix, and thanks to his play, took a 3-1 series lead.  That's when it all fell apart.  Despite Kobe continuing to put up huge numbers the Lakers lost the next two games forcing a game 7 in Phoenix.  It was in that game 7 that Kobe, and his reputation, took a major blow.  Kobe seemingly checked out of the game, refusing to shoot the ball.  The man who put on a scoring clinic the entire season, the man who put the team on his back and brought them within a win of advancing against a strong Suns team, only took 3 shots the second half, scoring 1 point.  That's right, 1 point.  Kobe was mercilessly skewered by the media and fans as a selfish ball hog who picked the most important game of the year to prove a point; without me scoring, and instead deferring to teammates, we have no chance of winning.

This carried on until 2008 when the Lakers hijacked Pau Gasol from Memphis (after numerous Kobe tantrums and trade demands) and Kobe reinvented himself yet again.  He began to trust his teammates, going inside to the twin towers of Gasol and Andrew Bynum.  He'd penetrate the defense early, kicking out to open shooters, all the while seeing how the opposition would be playing him.  By the second half he had the other team exactly where he wanted them, ready to take over if needed.  He was a triple-double threat that entire season, culminating in his first MVP award.  Even though they lost the championship in 6 games to the Celtics, he continued to play unselfishly, winning the next two titles along with Finals MVP honors.  And lets not forget Kobe dragging USA to the gold in 2008 with a team that included superstars such as LeBron James and Dwayne Wade.  When the game was on the line, it was Kobe time.  It appeared that Kobe 3.0 had finally matured and discovered what Bill Simmons refers to as "the secret" to winning; trusting your supporting cast.

Or so it seemed...

Fast forward to this season.  Kobe is again leading the league in scoring while shooting the ball 25 times on average a game.  His 373 shot attempts through 15 games is over 100 more than Monta Ellis, who has 253 shots.  He is again consistently putting up 40 point games, and most importantly, the Lakers are winning.  But haven't we seen this before?  Aren't these statistics eerily similar to that 2005-06 season?  The only difference is that the Lakers have a far superior team to that one.  Sure Derek Fisher can only hit game winners and couldn't stay in front of a cripple, and Pau Gasol has completely reverted into a soft, emotional mess on the floor, but there is no reason why Kobe should be shooting the way he is and ignoring his teammates.  When he gets the ball the entire team stands around, watching.  Nobody cuts, nobody sets off screens.  They stand and wait for Kobe to do what Kobe does.  And that's shoot the ball.  And shoot the ball.  And shoot the ball.  Whether he is double teamed, trapped, or contested, that shot is most likely going up one way or another.

The person who is most harmed by Kobe's reversion to Kobe 2.0 is Andrew Bynum.  Bynum has emerged as a top center in the league.  If healthy (and we all know that's a big "if") there is no reason he should not average a double double and dominate inside.  Unfortunately, Bynum is dependent upon his guards to pass him the ball, and more importantly, pass him the ball in position down low.  He does not have the luxury of having the ball in his hands to trigger plays such as Bryant does, and when Bryant is putting up shots, it's Bynum's game that suffers.  He's forced to get his points on rebounds and broken plays rather than being the number one option.  Looking to Bynum first not only gets the opposing team in foul trouble, but it opens up the outside for the Lakers shooters, and takes an immense amount of pressure off of Bryant.  It doesn't help that the offense instituted by new head coach Mike Brown appears to be similar to that employed during his Cleveland tenure, which is "give the ball to Kobe(LeBron) and get out of his way".

Kobe Bryant will have a monstrous statistical year, and most likely win the scoring title.  He may even win his second MVP award.  The Lakers will no doubt make the playoffs in the middle of the pack in the west and draw a competitive first round opponent.  However, in Los Angeles we only hang championship banners, and seasons are measured by those banners.  Kobe knows this better than anyone.  He's been through the ups and down with the Lakers, and seemed to have built himself into a model player, both physically and mentally, deferring to his teammates and taking over when the situation calls for it.  But all those lessons seem to have been forgotten during the lockout.  Whether it's the absence of Phil Jackson on the bench or his perception of his supporting cast, until Kobe Bryant rediscovers "the secret" and begins to be that model player again, this year will end being a season to forget.

Again.